RetroSearch Browse

Sat Sep 20 02:06:26 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136400.html

> 
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> 
> Donald Stufft wrote:
> 
>> My biggest problem with ``python3``, is what happens after 3.9.
> 
> Python2 technically includes 1.x versions as well, so it
> wouldn't be unprecedented for python3 to imply versions
> beyond 3.x. It would be a bit confusing, though.

My problem isn’t that it *includes* it, it’s that either people have to go
through the mess to update all of their things to ``python4`` at some point
in the future, or Python 3.x will need to eventually mean ``python``.

Well that or Python 4.x has a ``python3`` binary.

---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140919/fe09f2f9/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136400.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 394 - Clarification of what "python" command should invoke