RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 17 02:25:21 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136354.html

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:57:21 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> As long as the Java string manipulation functions don't check for
> surrogates, you should be fine with this representation.  Of course I
> suppose your matching functions (etc) don't check for them either, so
> you will be somewhat vulnerable to bugs due to treating them as
> characters.  But the same is true for CPython, AFAIK.

>From my point of view, the string function laxness is a feature, not a
bug.  But I get what you mean.

--David

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-September/136354.html below:

[Python-Dev] Multilingual programming article on the Red Hat Developer blog