On 09/03/2014 12:10 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:09:36 -0700, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> On 09/03/2014 08:58 AM, R. David Murray wrote: >>> >>> I'm OK with letting go of this invalid-cert issue myself, given the lack >>> of negative feedback Twisted got. I'll just keep my fingers crossed. >> >> I apologize if I missed this point, but if we have the source code then it is possible to go in and directly modify the >> application/utility to be able to talk over https to a router with an invalid certificate? This is an option when >> creating the ssl_context? > > The immediately preceding paragraph that you didn't quote said that the > context was 3rd party applications, not source code under your control. > Yes, you can (usually) still hack the source, but there are good reasons to > prefer to not do that, unfamiliarity with the codebase being just one of > them. I appreciate that there is a distinction, yet in most cases we have the source code available (it is the nature of Python) and if push comes to shove (and a bunch of other colloquialisms) then modifying that source code can get you up and running again. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4