On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > Nick Coghlan writes: > > > Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main > > reason it never graduated to the "stable" list). If you send me your public > > SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not, I can ask Luke to do it). > > Alternatively, CentOS 6 may exhibit the same problem. > > I wonder how many of these buildbots could be maintained by the kind > of folks who show up on core-mentorship asking "how can I help?" > > Just a thought -- I wouldn't be surprised if the reaction is universal > horror and the answer is "Are you crazy? Zero! Z-E-R-O!!" > > And of course most want to write code, not sysadm. Maintaining a buildbot isn't hard. (Although one thing I'm not sure of: If my bot goes down for an extended period of time, is any sort of automated email sent to me? I don't often check their status.) But it does mean a measure of trust in some external entity, or else some very careful rules (mainly firewall), which not every coder will know about. ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4