On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 08:00:14 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > That part of the proposal proved to be controversial, so we dropped it from > the original PEP in order to focus on meeting the Python 3.4 specific > release deadlines. This also had the benefit of working out the kinks in > the bootstrapping processing as part of the Python 3.4 release cycle. > > However, we still think we should start providing pip by default to Python > 2.7 users as well, at least as part of the Windows and Mac OS X installers. I don't agree with this. pip is simply not part of the 2.7 feature set. If you add pip to a bugfix version, then you have bugfix versions which are more featureful than others, which makes things more complicated to explain. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4