RetroSearch Browse

Sun Oct 26 23:58:34 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-October/136777.html

On 26 October 2014 14:28, Ray Donnelly <mingw.android at gmail.com> wrote:
> I like this idea. To reduce the workload, we should probably pick
> Python3 (at least initially)?

Aren't the existing patches on the tracker already for Python 3.5+?
They should be, as that's the only version that's likely to be a
possible target (unless you get someone to agree to allow a change
like this as in scope for Pythhon 2.7, which I've seen no indication
of). Maybe I'm confused here.

Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-October/136777.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of C compilers for Python on Windows