Hi, Windows is not the primary target of Python developers, probably because most of them work on Linux. Official Python binaries are currently built by Microsoft Visual Studio. Even if Python developers get free licenses thanks for Microsoft, I would prefer to use an open source compiler if it would be possible. So *anyone* can build Python from scatch. I don't like the requirement of having a license to build Python. The free version (Visual Studio Express) only supports 32-bit and doesn't support PGO build (Profile-Guided Optimizations, which are disabled if I remember correctly because of compiler bugs). I know that it's hard to replace Visual Studio. I don't want to do it right now, but I would like to discuss that with you. === Open Watcom Jeffrey Armstrong is working on the Python support of OpenWatcom(v2), see: http://lightningpython.org/ https://bitbucket.org/ArmstrongJ/lightning-python This compiler was initially written on MS-DOS in 32-bit, but it now supports Windows and Linux as well. The 64-bit mode is new and experimental. The Open Watcom "v2" project is actively developed at: https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/ On Linux, Open Watcom don't support dynamic linking. On Windows, it uses its own C library. I'm not sure that Open Watcom is the best choice to build Python on Windows. === MinGW Some people tried to compile Python. See for example: https://bitbucket.org/puqing/python-mingw We even got some patches: http://bugs.python.org/issue3871 (rejected) See also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15365249/build-python-with-mingw-and-gcc MinGW reuses the Microsoft C library and it is based on GCC which is very stable, actively developed, supports a lot of archiectures, etc. I guess that it should be possible to reuse third party GCC tools like the famous GDB debugger? === Cywin Cygwin was written compile POSIX applications on Windows and it provides a DLL for that. Python doesn't need that, it uses directly the Windows native API. I don't think that we should use Cygwin. === Clang I have no idea of the support of Clang on Windows. Which C library is used? I found some pages: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/MSVCCompatibility.html http://blog.llvm.org/2014/07/clangllvm-on-windows-update.html This article starts with "It’s time for an update on Clang’s support for building native Windows programs, compatible with Visual C++!". Good. I see binaries for Windows. === Other compilers? Do you know other C compiler which can be used to build Python? === Requirements A compiler alone is not enough. To develop, we need tools to automate the compilation, we need a good debugger, and other similar tools. (Personally, I don't need an IDE. I mostly write code on Linux and only run Windows to ensure that my code works on Windows before pushing it.) IMO 64-bit support is simply required (we currently provide 64-bit binaries on Windows). Supporting ARM can be interesting for Windows 8 and Windows 9. Some parts of Python are low-level like ctypes with libffi. The _decimal module uses libmpdec which is highly optimized. In short, the goal is to have a full working standard Python library. It's probably better to reuse the Microsoft C library instead of having to embed a different C library. What do you think? What about the Python stable ABI? Would it be broken if we use a different compiler? What about third party Python extensions? What about external dependencies like gzip, bz2, Tk, Tcl, OpenSSL, etc.? Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4