RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 8 21:36:07 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-October/136599.html

On Oct 8, 2014 7:20 AM, "Donald Stufft" <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 8, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Howdy,
> >
> > this question is a bit about general policy which is not yet
> > covered in the python recommendations:
> >
> > I see projects which do check-ins like "get rid of shebang lines"
> > and they remove those lines from non-script sources.
> >
> > It is not always clear to me what to do, so I tend to leave those
> > lines in per default, in order not to waste time thinking about it,
> > but well, today I was confronted with that.
> >
> > Digging a bit deeper shows the following:
> >
> > python docs:
> > No mention of shebang, but for Windows.
> >
https://docs.python.org/3/search.html?q=shebang&check_keywords=yes&area=default
> > https://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html?highlight=shebang
> >
> > Google's python style guide also says when a shebang is needed, but
> > does not forbid it.
> >
> > Pep 394 explains how to use shebang, but still nothing about not using
it.
> > http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
> >
> > So is there anything officially preferred, and should that go into pep
8?
>
> Some editors can use shebang lines to control syntax highlighting or
linting
> (mine for example will lint different for python2 vs python3 shebangs).

Does it support shebang lines like:

#!/usr/bin/env python

?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20141008/c0410605/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-October/136599.html below:

[Python-Dev] shebang policy, and pip