On Mon, Oct 6, 2014, at 19:13, Ned Deily wrote: > In article > <CAKJDb-P6nx5szhBeuxv0fWSJ+-5=U1cD6aY--eD2YqeWwRK4-g at mail.gmail.com>, > Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote: > > > 3. security: "fixing issues exploitable by attackers such as crashes, > > > privilege escalation and, optionally, other issues such as denial of > > > service attacks. Any other changes are not considered a security risk > > > and thus not backported to a security branch." > > > = 3.2.x and 3.3.x > > 3.1 is still in this category, is it not? According to PEP 375, it's > > a few months past due for its last release. > > http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0375/#maintenance-releases > > I don't think Benjamin was planning any further security releases. But, > in any case, the PEP should be updated, I guess. Benjamin? Oh, yeah, I'm really tired of 3.1, so it's over.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4