On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com> wrote: > My impression is that no 3.X user ever would want to stick > with any older version. > > Is that true, or am I totally wrong? My impression is that you're mostly right, but only because those who would still be on 3.1 are actually still on 2.5 ;). However as one who uses 3.x exclusively, I do still use 3.2 on a regular basis simply because it's the last release to support Windows 2000 and it does everything I need to do on that platform. Either way, that seems a bit tangential to my original point, which was that 3.1 is still technically an open security branch which is due to be closed (with or without it's last security release, which was due in June). -- Zach
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4