On 11/28/2014 09:34 AM, Demian Brecht wrote: > > I primarily use git for development. Having little or no effort to > context switch to work on CPython in any capacity (PEPs, code, etc) > would be hugely beneficial for me. Having a well defined workflow in > the docs (perhaps alongside "Lifecycle of a patch"?) would have > significantly lowered the initial barrier of entry for me. Given the > amount of time I put into that initially, I can only imagine how many > people it's entirely turned away from contributing. I'd definitely be > interested in contributing documentation around this (I've written up > something similar here > http://demianbrecht.github.io/vcs/2014/07/31/from-git-to-hg/) if > others feel that it would be valuable. That would be very valuable, thank you. -- ~Ethan~ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20141128/5d803cb3/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4