On 29/11/14 01:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[snip]
>
> Option 3: Make it legal to assign to the __dict__ attribute of a
> module object, so that we can write something like
>
> new_module = MyModuleSubclass(...)
> new_module.__dict__ = sys.modules[__name__].__dict__
> sys.modules[__name__].__dict__ = {} # ***
> sys.modules[__name__] = new_module
>
Why does MyModuleClass need to sub-class types.ModuleType?
Modules have no special behaviour, apart from the inability to write
to their __dict__ attribute, which is the very thing you don't want.
If it quacks like a module...
Cheers,
Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4