On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Ron Adam <ron3200 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Making comprehensions work more like generator expressions >> would, IMO, imply making the same change to all for loops: having a >> StopIteration raised by the body of the loop quietly terminate the >> loop. > > > I'm not suggesting making any changes to generator expressions or for loops > at all. They would continue to work like they currently do. But if you're suggesting making list comps react to StopIteration raised by their primary expressions, then to maintain the correspondence between a list comp and its expanded form, for loops would have to change too. Or should that correspondence be broken, in that single-expression loop constructs become semantically different from statement loop constructs? ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4