On 30/05/2014 18:40, Mark Roberts wrote: > > What I'd really like to see is a Python 2.8 that makes sufficient > changes to Python 2 that writing libraries which cross the boundary > between 2 and 3 is relatively easy instead of a painful nightmarish > chore. Because when push comes to shove, Python 2 support is still > infinitely more important than Python 3. > > -Mark > What is the point of flogging a horse that's been dead for so long that it's already down to a skeleton? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4