On Thu May 15 2014 at 10:24:45 AM, Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> > wrote: > > We already have such buildbots, they are in the "unstable" category. > > You can browse through existing buildbots here: > > https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/ > > I can't see how to distinguish "stable" from "unstable" (or to view > just the "unstable" category. Take http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable&category=3.x.unstableand remove the category GET argument that you don't want to see, e.g. to only see unstable buildbots use http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?category=3.x.unstable > What do those two categories have to do > with "supported" and "unsupported"? > Antoine can give the definitive answer, but I view stable buildbots as staying up and testing critical platforms. I.e. when I submit a patch I make sure the stable buildbots are always green (unless it's a transient failure) and I don't worry about the unstable ones (I view them as more informative than necessary). Basically red stable buildbot should block a release. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140515/22692616/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4