> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net > <mailto:solipsis at pitrou.net>> wrote: > I think we have reached a point where adding porting-related facilities AFAIK, The only porting specific feature is %s as a synonym for %b. Not pretty, but tolerable. Otherwise, I have the impression that the PEP pretty much stands on its own. > in 3.5 may actually slow down the pace of porting, rather than > accelerate it (because people will then wait for 3.5 to start porting > stuff). Or, they should download the source and compile and continue or start porting as soon as the bytes % is added. Having earlier Windows and Mac preview binaries might help a tiny bit. If you are saying that Py3 development should not be driven by Py2 concerns, I agree. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4