RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 28 19:49:06 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133678.html

On 2014-03-28 16:39, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 28 March 2014 16:22, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
>> On 03/28/2014 12:18 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> I'm mostly arguing the FLOSS project should feel free to ignore
>>> high-maintenance-cost commercial concerns until those concerns bring
>>> either blook (funded developer time) or treasure (pooled to pay for
>>> the same time) to the table to pay for them.
>>
>> Dangit,
>>
>>  s/blook/blood/
>
> Rats. I thought I'd just learned a new word. Regardless of reality, I
> think "blook" should be a real word :-)
>
Yes, and it should mean "funded developer time on or for an open source
project".

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133678.html below:

[Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree