RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 28 17:30:35 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133668.html

On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:19:52 -0500
Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
> <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is it open to debate or is it now cast in stone?
> >
> > I think the barrier for changing str() is lower than that for changing
> > repr(), but I would be against any changes in this area.  (I may have had a
> > different view if ISO 8601 syntax for timedeltas was not so ugly. :-)
> 
> I think str() should be left alone. It's clear there is no one best
> str representation for timedelta objects.

But at least we could have one that isn't terribly confusing :-)

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133668.html below:

[Python-Dev] Negative timedelta strings