On 2014-03-27 15:58, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 03/27/2014 04:42 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >> I also seem to recall Guido saying he liked it [%a], which flipped the >> discussion from "do we have a good rationale for including it?" to "do >> we have a good rationale for the BDFL to ignore his instincts?". >> However, it would be up to Guido to confirm that recollection, and if >> "Guido likes it" is part of the reason for inclusion of the %a code, >> the PEP should mention that explicitly. > > I checked Guido's posts (Subject contains PEP 461, From contains guido) and did not see anything to that effect. > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:09:23 -0800 Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 460 reboot """If we have %b for strictly interpolating bytes, I'm fine with adding %a for calling ascii() on the argument and then interpolating the result after ASCII-encoding it."""
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4