RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 27 09:19:32 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133570.html

Eli Bendersky writes:
 > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:

 >> I would have said that, too, several years ago, but I think we've
 >> been requiring (or using anyway) PEPs for a lot more things now.

 > YMMV but IMHO this is a good thing.

FWIW I was just talking to Matz yesterday, and asked him about it.  He
said he thought PEPs worked great for Python (in the context of
explain that his (and Ruby's) style is different).

Just-ask-the-nearest-independent-opinion-ly y'rs,

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133570.html below:

[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]