A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133542.html below:

[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]

[Python-Dev] On the necessity of PEPs [was "collections.sortedtree"]Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Wed Mar 26 22:27:54 CET 2014
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014, at 14:25, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 01:55 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 
> >It's not a bad idea. (I believe others have proposed an red-black tree.)
> >Certainly, it requires a PEP and a few months of bikesheding, though.
> 
> Generally, PEPs aren't necessary for simple or relatively uncontroversial
> additions to existing modules or the stdlib.

I would have said that, too, several years ago, but I think we've been
requiring (or using anyway) PEPs for a lot more things now. OrderedDict
had a PEP for example.

I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4