On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>wrote: > Am 23.03.14 17:22, schrieb Guido van Rossum: > > At Dropbox I work with a large group of very capable developers on > > several large code bases that are currently in 2.7. We are constantly > > changing our code to make it more secure (there are several teams > > specifically in charge of that). And yet porting to Python 3 is > > completely out of scope, for a variety of reasons. > > > > Please stop your wishful thinking. > > I can stop expressing it; I don't think I can stop wishing it :-) > > If it's really unrealistic that Dropbox will ever port the code > to Python 3, would you then think that Python 3 is a doomed project, > since it won't ever see significant usage? > No, it's just that the timescale is drastically different. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140323/03d2cce6/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4