RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 15 03:17:02 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133177.html

I don't think so. asyncio depends on selectors but not vice versa. The
selectors module was not part of PEP 3156. It is solid and I don't see any
reason why it should get a reprieve from the usual strict backwards
compatibility standards.

--Guido

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rodola at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:25 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Not Provisional:
>>>
>>> selectors
>>>
>>
>> Wouldn't it be wiser to consider this one provisional as well?
>>
>
> +1 because of the intimate ties to asyncio
>
> Eli
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>> --
>> Giampaolo - http://grodola.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-Dev mailing list
>> Python-Dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eliben%40gmail.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140314/a8c8aa88/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133177.html below:

[Python-Dev] Confirming status of new modules in 3.4