Am 14.03.2014 16:55, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 08:52 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 07:20 AM, vinay.sajip wrote: >> >> diff --git a/.hgignore b/.hgignore >> >> --- a/.hgignore >> >> +++ b/.hgignore >> >> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ >> >> reflog.txt$ >> >> tags$ >> >> Lib/plat-mac/errors.rsrc.df.rsrc >> >> +Doc/tools/sphinx/ >> >> +Doc/tools/docutils/ >> >> +Doc/tools/jinja/ >> >> +Doc/tools/jinja2/ >> >> +Doc/tools/pygments/ >> > >> > Why are you readding these when they were apparently purposely removed >> > in eef7899ea7ab? >> >> It is rather ugly to build the docs in a 3.3 checkout, then update to >> default and run 'hg status' without those entries in .hgignore. I can >> understand not wanting to be bombarded by all of the untracked files, >> but it's also pretty easy to enable the purge extension and do "hg >> purge Doc/tools". > > This is why everyone should use the share extension and have separate > working copies for every branch. :) I agree. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4