On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 3/13/2014 7:34 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> >> Christian Heimes writes: >> >> > But I don't want it to sound like an advert... Suggestions? >> >> Not to worry. It *can't* be an advert -- it's all true, and there are >> no irrelevant half-naked glistening bodies. (Former newts in the pond >> don't count.) >> >> Seriously, while "expect a clean build" is not "news" for Python, > > > It is for a Windows repository build. I just rebuilt: 3.3 gives lots of > warning from multiple files; 3.4 none. > > >> Accompanied by an open invitation for reports to >> the contrary, that's hardly like a commercial. > > > Now that no warnings is a serious goal for 3.4+, I will report them should > they recur. If we're at no warnings, and no warnings is a serious goal, warnings should be errors.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4