RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 10 23:58:59 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133079.html

I'm not a dev, so my comment doesn't have that much weight, but it is
possible to stop flooding the mailing list with idle chitchat about
something mostly irrelevant and non-productive?

There's nothing wrong with the current Python versioning scheme.  Python
4 is not planned for the near future.  I don't see anything else worthy
of discussion on this topic.

Allen Li

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:35:29PM +0000, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 10/03/2014 22:28, Greg Ewing wrote:
> >Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all
> >>about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<,
> >>3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A.
> >
> >And we have all of UCS-4 to play with, so for all
> >practical purposes the 3.x line can live forever!
> >
> >The downside is that we'll get endless complaints
> >from jmfauth about the Flexible Version Number
> >Representation. :-(
> >
> 
> Drat, drat and double drat, you beat me to it :)
> 
> -- 
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what
> you can do for our language.
> 
> Mark Lawrence
> 
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/cyberdupo56%40gmail.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133079.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 4: don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibility