RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 10 23:35:29 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133078.html

On 10/03/2014 22:28, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all
>> about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<,
>> 3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A.
>
> And we have all of UCS-4 to play with, so for all
> practical purposes the 3.x line can live forever!
>
> The downside is that we'll get endless complaints
> from jmfauth about the Flexible Version Number
> Representation. :-(
>

Drat, drat and double drat, you beat me to it :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133078.html below:

don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibility