Chris Angelico wrote: > Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all > about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<, > 3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A. And we have all of UCS-4 to play with, so for all practical purposes the 3.x line can live forever! The downside is that we'll get endless complaints from jmfauth about the Flexible Version Number Representation. :-( -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4