A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133065.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 4: don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibility

[Python-Dev] Python 4: don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibilityChris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 20:29:02 CET 2014
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19 at gmail.com> wrote:
> You forgot 3., and 3.$.
>

They're both earlier than digits. Comma is 2C and dollar is 24, I
remember those from the earliest days of playing around in assembly
language on an Epson PC-compatible running MS-DOS 5 :)

But that's beside the point. I don't think there'd be huge problems
with a 4.0 release that's just like 3.10 except that it's a little
more free with removal of deprecateds. Maybe that could be the point
at which 2.x compatibility is dropped, like the u"string" notation. Or
maybe not :)

ChrisA
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4