RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 10 16:38:41 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133038.html

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info>wrote:

> If Python 4 is a conservative release, I don't see any reason to bump
> the major version number until after Python 3.9.

and why even then?

> Perhaps we need a long-term schedule?
>

why not:

3.5: August 2015
> 3.6: February 2017
> 3.7: August 2018
> 3.8: February 2020
> 3.9: August 2021

3.10: February 2023
>
3.11 August 2023
3.12 February 2024
....

version numbering is not  decimal -- a bump to 4.0 should mean _something_

(Though from the above, we've got a few years before we need to worry about
that!)

-Chris

-- 

Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140310/b4b6cebc/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133038.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 4: don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibility