10.03.14 15:09, Nick Coghlan написав(ла): > Huh, I missed that change. Don't we still need U when writing 2/3 > compatible code at this point? If so, perhaps we may want to reconsider > this particular deprecation in 3.4.1. In most cases the 'U' mode either no-op or forbidden in Python 3. It may be needed only when you use built-in open() in Python 2 and open without the encoding and newlines arguments in Python 3 (but it will be better to use io.open()). http://bugs.python.org/issue15204
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4