RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 10 16:42:45 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133026.html

On 2014-03-10 15:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:55:26PM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
> [...]
>> So can we please try to stop scheduling another major Python version
>> breaking almost all modules and all applications just to be pendantic?
>>
>> No, we should not remove any old feature in Python 4. Python 4 should
>> be just a minor release following the previous 3.x release.
>
> I often talk about "Python 4000" as the next possible opportunity for
> major backwards incompatible changes, but of course that's not decided
> yet, and given the long term pain of the 2->3 transition, it may be
> quite conservative, with no radical changes. Perhaps I ought to use
> Python 5000 as my target for radical language changes?
>
You mean that backwards-incompatible changes should be limited to prime-
number major versions only? :-)

[snip]

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/133026.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 4: don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibility