Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-March/132993.html below:

[Python-Dev] unittest.TestCase.assert* methods calling TestCase.fail method directly.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] undocumented help() function change in Python 3.4?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] for Python + Java devs - real-world importance of the security model
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi All,

This is my first time on any mailing list... Please point out any mistakes..

I had a suggestion about the implementation of
unittest.TestCase.assert* methods. They all call failureException
separately. This is also what the unittest.TestCase.fail method does.

Is there any specific reason it is so?

If not, then is there any reason stopping them from calling the
unittest.TestCase.fail method? As then we have one point where all the
tests fail meaning that one can reimplement the unittest.TestCase.fail
method for handling test failures in their own custom way.


Regards,
Pradyun

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] undocumented help() function change in Python 3.4?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] for Python + Java devs - real-world importance of the security model
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4