On 03/04/2014 06:46 PM, Larry Hastings wrote: > On 03/04/2014 03:59 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> I too would like an rc3, especially to see if issue 19021 can be fixed, which >> I suspect will hit a lot of people. > > I talked to the other guys on the 3.4 team, and we're all willing to do an rc3 this weekend. I'll add that to PEP 429. > > > In other news, I'm thrilled to confirm something Antoine mentioned a week or two ago: it is literally impossible for > garden-variety core devs to push new branches back into trunk. I tried to, early this morning (PST), with someone > logged in to hg.python.org ready to clean up in case it actually worked. But happily hg hooks on the server reject new > branches every time. > > Since this banishes my chief objection to publishing the repo where I do my cherry picking, I'll be publishing that repo > this week. I think I still have a rebase ahead of me, so I'm going wait until after the latest (and hopefully last!) > round of cherry-picking. I'll post to python-dev once the tree is public. Thanks, Larry! I know I have no idea how much work it takes to be an RM, but I appreciate you taking the time, learning the ropes, and getting this done for the rest of us. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4