On 03/03/2014 21:38, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 4 Mar 2014 07:32, "Larry Hastings" <larry at hastings.org > <mailto:larry at hastings.org>> wrote: > > > > On 03/03/2014 05:05 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > >> > >> 2014-03-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org > <mailto:larry at hastings.org>>: > >>> > >>> I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for > >>> Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in > >>> the final version? > >>> > >>> Sadly, yes. > >> > >> Ok, I created: > >> http://bugs.python.org/issue20843 > >> > >> Why do you say "sadly"? It's up to you to decide if a change can wait > >> Python 3.4.1 or not. Feel free to close my cherry-pick issue as > >> wontfix. > > > > > > It was intended as gentle comedy. > > Related question - have you decided yet whether or not to do an rc3? > > I ask, as I believe it would be good to give the folks like Mike Bayer > and Armin Ronacher (who picked up test coverage gaps in rc2 via the > Alembic and Flask test suites respectively) a chance to rerun their > tests before we declare 3.4 final. > > Cheers, > Nick. > Will this impact on the decision http://bugs.python.org/issue20846 ? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4