On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-06-26 13:04 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org>: >> For the same reason, I agree with Victor that we should ditch the >> threading-disabled builds. It's too much of a hassle for no actual, >> practical benefit. People who want a threadless unicodeless Python can >> install Python 1.5.2 for all I care. > > By the way, adding a buildbot for testing Python without thread > support is not enough. The buildbot is currently broken since more > than one month and nobody noticed :-p I've opened http://bugs.python.org/issue21755 to fix the test a couple of weeks ago. --Berker > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Fedora%20without%20threads%203.x/ > > Ok, I noticed, but I consider that I spent too much time on this minor > use case. I prefer to leave such task to someone else :-) > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/berker.peksag%40gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4