Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/135228.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:37:50PM -0400, Ben Hoyt wrote:
> I don't mind iterdir() and would take it :-), but I'll just say why I
> chose the name scandir() -- though it wasn't my suggestion originally:
> 
> iterdir() sounds like just an iterator version of listdir(), kinda
> like keys() and iterkeys() in Python 2. Whereas in actual fact the
> return values are quite different (DirEntry objects vs strings), and
> so the name change reflects that difference a little.

+1 

I think that's a good objective reason to prefer scandir, which suits 
me, because my subjective opinion is that "iterdir" is an inelegant 
and less than attractive name.


-- 
Steven

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4