On 06/24/2014 12:54 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > > Yes, we are committed to maintaining > Python 2.7 for multiple years but that doesn't mean we have to fix every > open issue or even most open issues. Any or all of the above costs may > apply to any changes we make. For many of our users, the best > maintenance policy for Python 2.7 would be the least change possible. +1 We need to keep 2.7 running, but we don't need to kill ourselves doing it. If a bug has been there for a while, the affected users are probably working around it by now. ;) -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4