RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 6 21:05:05 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/134898.html

On Fri Jun 06 2014 at 2:59:24 PM, <dw+python-dev at hmmz.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:49:24PM +0400, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
> > None of the options are particularly good, but yes, I think that's an
> > option we have to consider. We're supporting 2.7.x for 6 more years on
> > a compiler that is already 6 years old.
>
> Surely that is infinitely less desirable than simply bumping the minor
> version?
>

Nope. A new minor release of Python is a massive undertaking which is why
we have saved ourselves the hassle of doing a Python 2.8 or not giving a
clear signal as to when Python 2.x will end as a language.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140606/c5e7385c/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/134898.html below:

[Python-Dev] Moving Python 3.5 on Windows to a new compiler