Le 04/06/2014 02:51, Chris Angelico a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > It would. The downsides of a UTF-8 representation would be slower > iteration and much slower (O(N)) indexing/slicing. There's no reason for iteration to be slower. Slicing would get O(slice offset + slice size) instead of O(slice size). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4