RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jun 4 12:53:46 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/134733.html

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote:
> And I'm saying that not to discourage Unicode addition to MicroPython,
> but to hint that "force-force" approach implemented by CPython3 and
> causing rage and split in the community is not appreciated.

FWIW, it's Python 3 (the language) and not CPython 3.x (the
implementation) that specifies Unicode strings in this way. I don't
know why it has to cause a split in the community; this is the one way
to make sure *everyone's* strings work perfectly, rather than having
ASCII strings work fine and others start tripping over problems in
various APIs.

ChrisA

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/134733.html below:

[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython