dw+python-dev at hmmz.org writes: > Given the specialized kinds of application this Python > implementation is targetted at, it seems UTF-8 is ideal considering > the huge memory savings resulting from the compressed > representation, I think you really need to check what the applications are in detail. UTF-8 costs about 35% more storage for Japanese, and even more for Chinese, than does UTF-16. So if you might be using a lot of Asian localized strings, it might even be worth implementing PEP-393 to get the best of both worlds for most strings.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4