On 6/3/2014 3:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: >> 2014-06-03 23:38 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com>: >>> Is this an intentional change? And if so, is it formally documented >>> somewhere? I don't recall seeing anything about it, but my >>> recollection doesn't mean much. >> Yes, it's intentional. See the issue for the rationale: >> http://bugs.python.org/issue19995 > Thanks! I'll fix (in this case, simply remove) the test and cite that issue. Wouldn't it be better to keep the test, but expect the operation to fail? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140603/6c255902/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4