RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 2 02:19:06 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/134696.html

On Jun 1, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> Le 01/06/2014 10:11, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
>> 
>> My feeling is that the CPython standard library should be written for
>> CPython, that is, it should stick to the current naive implementation of
>> median, and if PyPy wants to speed the function up, they can provide
>> their own version of the module. I should *not* complicate the
>> implementation by trying to detect which Python the code is running
>> under and changing algorithms accordingly. However, I should put a
>> comment in the module pointing at the tracker issue. Does this sound
>> right to others?
> 
> It sounds ok to me.

That makes sense.

Raymond
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140601/bb02d8b1/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/134696.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should standard library modules optimize for CPython?