RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 22 09:33:41 CEST 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-July/135566.html

Ben Hoyt <benhoyt at gmail.com> writes:

> I think if I were doing this from scratch I'd reimplement listdir() in
> Python as "return [e.name for e in scandir(path)]".
...
> So my basic plan is to have an internal helper function in
> posixmodule.c that either yields DirEntry objects or strings. And then
> listdir() would simply be defined something like "return
> list(_scandir(path, yield_strings=True))" in C or in Python.
>
> My reasoning is that then there'll be much less (if any) code
> duplication between scandir() and listdir().
>
> Does this sound like a reasonable approach?

Note: listdir() accepts an integer path (an open file descriptor that
refers to a directory) that is passed to fdopendir() on POSIX [4] i.e.,
*you can't use scandir() to replace listdir() in this case* (as I've
already mentioned in [1]). See the corresponding tests from [2].

[1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-July/135296.html
[2] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-June/135265.html

>From os.listdir() docs [3]:

> This function can also support specifying a file descriptor; the file
> descriptor must refer to a directory.

[3] https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/os.html#os.listdir
[4] http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/3.4/Modules/posixmodule.c#l3736

--
Akira

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-July/135566.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 471 "scandir" accepted