On 07/09/2014 02:33 PM, Ben Hoyt wrote: >> >> On a system which did not supply is_dir automatically I would write that as: >> >> for entry in os.scandir(path): >> if ignore_entry(entry.name): >> continue >> if os.path.isdir(entry.full_name): >> # do something interesting >> >> Not hard to read or understand, no time wasted in unnecessary lstat calls. > > No, but how do you know whether you're on "a system which did not > supply is_dir automatically"? The above is not cross-platform, or at > least, not efficient cross-platform, which defeats the whole point of > scandir -- the above is no better than listdir(). Hit a directory with 100,000 entries and you'll change your mind. ;) Okay, so the issue is you /want/ to write an efficient, cross-platform routine... hrmmm..... thinking........ Okay, marry the two ideas together: scandir(path, info=None, onerror=None) """ Return a generator that returns one directory entry at a time in a DirEntry object info: None --> DirEntries will have whatever attributes the O/S provides 'type' --> DirEntries will already have at least the file/dir distinction 'stat' --> DirEntries will also already have stat information """ DirEntry.is_dir() Return True if this is a directory-type entry; may call os.lstat if the cache is empty. DirEntry.is_file() Return True if this is a file-type entry; may call os.lstat if the cache is empty. DirEntry.is_symlink() Return True if this is a symbolic link; may call os.lstat if the cache is empty. DirEntry.stat Return the stat info for this link; may call os.lstat if the cache is empty. This way both paradigms are supported. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4