RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jan 27 10:39:55 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/132126.html

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:01:08 -0800
Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
> On 01/26/2014 08:40 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Vajrasky Kok 
> > <sky.kok at speaklikeaking.com <mailto:sky.kok at speaklikeaking.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     In case we are taking "not backporting anything at all" road, what is
> >     the best fix for the document?
> >
> >
> > I would say no fix is needed for this doc because the signature 
> > suggests (correctly) that passing times by keyword is not supported.
> 
> Where does it do that?

In the "[,times]" spelling, which is the spelling customarily used for
positional-only arguments.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/132126.html below:

[Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)