RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jan 27 05:28:09 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/132116.html

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Vajrasky Kok
<sky.kok at speaklikeaking.com>wrote:

> What about this alternative? Makes -1 consistently mean unlimited
> repetition and other negative numbers consistently mean zero
> repetitions
>

-1

I think this idea was already rejected on the bug tracker.  It will be very
surprising if list(repeat(x, n)) would be different from [x] * n for
integer n.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140126/6d591b5b/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/132116.html below:

[Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)