On 01/26/2014 03:42 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > I think that is an over-simplification. The argument unpacking was handy > in a number of situations where *args wouldn't suffice: > > lambda (px, py), (qx, qy): ((px - qx) ** 2 + (py - qy) ** 2) ** 0.5 > > IIRC, the original reason for the change was that it simplified the > compiler a bit, > not that it was broken or not useful. I'm not sure if that's applicable or other issues arise with: def fn(*p): px,py,qx,qy = p; return ((px - qx) ** 2 + (py - qy) ** 2) ** 0.5 Thanks in advance! Francis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4