On 01/20/2014 03:53 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Please turn the question around and look at it with your release > manager hat on rather than your creator of Argument Clinic hat: if I > came to you and said I wanted to add a new public API to the inspect > module after the second beta release, what would you say? Can you > honestly say that if *someone else* was proposing the inclusion of a > new public API this late in the release cycle, you would say yes? > You're right. Optional group information won't be a public API in 3.4. //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140120/6b448fb3/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4